Skip to main content

Reality and Perception: Hoffman’s Interface

Donald Hoffman, a cognitive scientist from the University of California, states that our perceptions are not a direct reflection of the objective world but rather a user interface designed by evolution. In his "Interface Theory of Perception"
Hoffman argues that the reality we believe to perceive is not the objective "real" reality but an interface created by our brains to facilitate our existence by simplifying the scope of our perceptions, this is to say, an interface created for practical reasons since, the implication being, pure or total reality - whatever it might be- is impractical and poses in some  unknown  way a direct threat to our survival. Hoffman compares this  interface to a computer desktop, where the icons on the screen represent files and programs but are not the actual files or programs themselves. 


It's a bit like Magritte's famous painting "The Treachery  of Images" or, to go straight  to the point, we are back to Western philosophy being a series of endless footnotes on Plato's "Theory of the Ideas". The nature of reality and how far or how much we should trust our perceptions is an existential conundrum that persists. 

For Hoffman, this interface  is the fruit of our evolved brains because survival is more important than the attainment of metaphysical certainties. We perceive only what is useful for our survival and reproduction, not what is necessarily true. 

Hoffman  uses the concept of “fitness payoffs” to elaborate this point. These payoffs are the benefits that an organism gains from certain behaviors and perceptions that increase its evolutionary fitness. Lions don't need to know why the antelopes roam the savannah. They just need to know where to hunt them in order to feed, be strong and reproduce.

The most difficult concept to grasp in Hoffman’s theories is the idea of the 
Conscious Agents: reality is created through infinite interactions by what he calls conscious agents: these are not only humans but also Artificial intelligences and any conscious non-human entities,  should these exist. Hoffman proposes that Space and Time are therefore not preordained and that it's these endless, infinite interactions between conscious agents what creates Space and Time.

Hoffman’s theories align somewhat with concepts from quantum physics. Quantum physicists have shown that quantum systems do not seem to be definite objects localized in space until they are observed. And if we recall the Double-Slit experiment where observation can cause changes and affect "reality" the implications are quite interesting. 


So, like the Gnostics but following a completely different path, Hoffman seems to imply that consciousness is the only reality. But also, that for practical survival reasons, we don't have access to reality, to our consciousness, unless not fully, since we are  unprepared to deal with this reality because of our biological, physical limitations. Perhaps we are like the fly who has fallen into a pot of water and ignores what's a pot, who made the pot or even what water is for that matter and merely drinks the water and ends up drowning. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reflections on Liber MMM

"Human society as a whole is a vast brainwashing machine whose semantic rules and sex roles create a social robot." Robert Anton Wilson Six months ago, seeking a new metaphysical model, I approached the IOT ( the Illuminates of Thanateros).  The Illuminates of Thanateros (IOT) is an international magical order formed in the early 1980s, officially around 1987, by Peter J. Carroll and Ray Sherwin, key figures in the development of chaos magic. Emerging from the ideas in Carroll’s Liber Null and Sherwin’s writings in the late 1970s, the order took its name from “Thanatos” (death) and “Eros” (sex), representing the polar forces of magical energy and human experience. The IOT was created to promote chaos magic as a practical, results-oriented system stripped of dogma, emphasizing techniques such as sigil work, altered states, and belief as a tool to be adopted and discarded. Its objectives include fostering magical training and initiation within a struct...

All Gods are Welcome

    He was a wise man who invented God. Plato It's not unusual for many people who are looking for a particular spiritual path to do so first by knocking on the door of mainstream, organised religion. After all, mainstream religions have achieved the impossible at least on one level: they have made the belief in the supernatural acceptable to an extent. Yes, they have sought this through unscrupulous means at times and by finding strength in numbers. The problem, of course, is that exclusive belief in one religious paradigm is at best hugely limiting. At worst, it's unadulterated fundamentalism. And fundamentalism, regardless of the particular flavour and packaging it comes in, is normally always a dangerous thing. Somehow, be it through the work of the crusaders or of  Buddhists killing Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar or ISIS and their campaign  of terror in recent times, people always end up dying.  So, the most discerning spiritual se...

Aeonics and the death of God

Mainstream religions are limiting by design. Limits are probably necessary for us humans but there is an implicit problem with religions: they resist change, by design, since they purport to stand for inmutable truths. I spent a long time trying to balance my former Christian faith and the impossible challenges of living in a global, enlightened and post Christian world. I had created my own metaphysical prison.  But of course, I came to realise that it the issue goes far beyond all that. We don't live in a post- Christian world. We live in a post- Theist world. This is to say, what we thought of as God, what we described as God in such intricate detail in all our different religions across time was merely a construct, a way of creating a metaphysical superstructure that would help us hold civilization together. But a construct isn't necessarily the truth. It is important to note that rejection of the different guises that we, as humans, have chosen to present our g...